Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the removal of the stalls and structures under Section 314 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 was lawful and whether the writ petitioners were entitled to a mandamus for restoration or allotment of alternate sites.
Analysis: Section 312 prohibits erection of structures or fixtures on a street or over a drain, channel, well or tank so as to cause obstruction, encroachment, projection, or occupation, unless erected with the Commissioner's permission. Section 314 empowers the Commissioner to remove, without notice, structures erected in contravention of Section 312. On the material placed before the Court, the stalls were found to be standing on a sewer line or chamber, were not shown to have been erected with the Commissioner's permission, and no sanctioned plan was produced to establish legality. The existence of health licences did not legalise the erection of the stalls or fetter action under Section 314. Once the removal was held to be lawful, there was no legal basis for directing the Municipal Corporation to provide alternate land or restoration by way of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Conclusion: The removal action was valid and the writ petitioners were not entitled to restoration, alternate allotment, or other mandamus relief.