Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>AO correctly allowed Section 80P(2)(d) deduction for cooperative society's interest income from bank deposits</h1> <h3>The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 5 (2) Maharashtra Versus Yantranirman Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha</h3> The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 5 (2) Maharashtra Versus Yantranirman Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha - TMI Issues Involved:1. Deletion of disallowance of deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Eligibility of interest earned from investments with a cooperative society for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.3. Consideration of the decision of the Karnataka High Court in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society.Detailed Analysis:1. Deletion of Disallowance of Deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961:The Revenue argued that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance of the deduction claimed under section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961, amounting to Rs. 1,84,73,670/-. This deduction was claimed by the assessee as interest earned from a cooperative bank. The Revenue referenced the Supreme Court decision in Totgars Co-operative Sales Society Ltd. vs. ITO, where it was held that interest income earned by a cooperative society from surplus funds is taxable under 'Income from other sources' and does not qualify for deduction as business income under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The Tribunal, however, upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the issue is no longer res integra and referenced its recent coordinate bench's order in The Rena Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. vs. PCIT, which rejected similar arguments from the Revenue.2. Eligibility of Interest Earned from Investments with a Cooperative Society for Deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in holding that interest earned by the assessee on its surplus investments with a cooperative society is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal examined the statutory provision and concluded that interest income derived by a cooperative society from its investments with another cooperative society qualifies for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal emphasized that the term 'co-operative society' as defined under section 2(19) includes cooperative banks, and thus, interest income from such banks is eligible for deduction. The Tribunal also noted that the insertion of sub-section (4) to section 80P does not affect the eligibility for deduction under section 80P(2)(d).3. Consideration of the Decision of the Karnataka High Court in the Case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society:The Revenue argued that the CIT(A) did not give due consideration to the Karnataka High Court's decision in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society, where it was held that a cooperative society is not eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) on interest income earned from deposits in a cooperative bank. The Tribunal acknowledged the conflicting judicial pronouncements on this issue but chose to follow the decisions in favor of the assessee, including those of the Karnataka High Court in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society and the Gujarat High Court in State Bank Of India vs. CIT. The Tribunal concluded that the interest income earned by a cooperative society from investments held with a cooperative bank is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d).Conclusion:The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the disallowance of the deduction claimed under section 80P. The Tribunal held that the interest income earned by the assessee from investments with a cooperative society qualifies for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) and that the CIT(A) had rightly considered the relevant judicial pronouncements. The Tribunal's order was pronounced in the open Court on 26.03.2024.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found