ITAT Partially Accepts Cash Deposit Explanation; Allows Partial Relief for Agricultural Income in Section 69A Appeal.

The ITAT condoned a 14-day delay in filing the appeal, admitting it for adjudication. The assessee's explanation for cash deposits during demonetization was partially accepted. The Tribunal allowed relief of Rs. 4,00,000 towards cash deposits, acknowledging agricultural income, while confirming the remaining additions under section 69A. The appeal was partly allowed.

---

---

Issues:
Delay in filing appeal, Source of cash deposits, Assessment of income from money lending business and agricultural activities.

Delay in filing appeal:
The appeal filed by the assessee was directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). There was a delay of 14 days in filing the appeal, for which a petition for condonation of delay was filed. The Appellate Tribunal, after considering the reasons for delay, found a reasonable cause for the delay and decided to condone the delay in the interests of justice, admitting the appeal for adjudication.

Source of cash deposits:
The case involved an individual assessee deriving income from salary, money lending business, and agricultural activities. The Assessing Officer noticed significant cash deposits in the assessee's bank account during the demonetization period. The assessee explained the source of cash deposits as a combination of opening cash balance, loan from LIC, and income from salary and agricultural activities. However, the Assessing Officer was not convinced with the explanation and made additions under section 69A of the Income-tax Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) partially allowed relief but confirmed a substantial amount as additions.

Assessment of income from money lending business and agricultural activities:
The assessee argued that the cash deposits were sourced from opening cash balance, income from agricultural activities, and collections from money lending business. The Appellate Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to provide evidence of income from agricultural operations and money lending business. However, considering the agricultural income declared in the previous years, the Tribunal allowed relief of Rs. 4,00,000 towards cash deposits, in addition to the relief granted by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The remaining amount of cash deposits was confirmed as additions.

In conclusion, the appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed, with relief granted towards cash deposits based on the assessment of agricultural income and expenses.

---