TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Rules in Favor of Reevaluation of Disallowed Contributions, Directs AO to Consider Evidence for Fresh Decision.</h1> <h3>Sri Elavarthy Ramana Reddy Versus The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax Bengaluru</h3> Sri Elavarthy Ramana Reddy Versus The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax Bengaluru - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of expenses under section 36(1)(va) of the Act based on tax audit report.2. Claim of relief under section 43B of the Act for belated remittance of employees' PF/ESI contributions.3. Request for remitting the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh adjudication.Analysis:The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Bangalore involved several key issues. Firstly, the disallowance of expenses under section 36(1)(va) of the Act was contested by the assessee. The disallowance was made based on the tax audit report, leading to a disagreement between the Revenue and the Assessee. The Assessee argued that the disallowance was not justified, particularly concerning the belated remittance of employees' PF/ESI contributions. The Assessee relied on section 43B of the Act, which provides relief if such payments are made before the due date of filing the return under section 139 of the Act.Moreover, the Assessee presented detailed evidence regarding the salary payments and the dates of PF and ESI contributions. The Tribunal noted the details provided by the Assessee, highlighting the discrepancies between the due dates and the actual payment dates. The Tribunal acknowledged the Assessee's contentions and found merit in the case presented. Consequently, the Tribunal decided to remit the issue to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication.The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the details provided by the Assessee and instructed the AO to pass a speaking order in favor of the Assessee after giving them an opportunity to be heard and present evidence. The Tribunal ultimately allowed the appeal of the Assessee for statistical purposes, indicating a favorable outcome for the Assessee in this particular case. The judgment was pronounced in the open court on 14th December 2023, concluding the legal proceedings before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Bangalore.
TaxTMI 