Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether simultaneous execution petitions to execute the same decree in more than one court are maintainable without obtaining prior permission of the court which passed the decree.
Analysis: The provisions governing execution permit a decree to be executed by the court which passed it or by the transferee court after transfer. The Original Side Rules also contemplate execution on the Original Side and transfer to another court, and do not prohibit execution in more than one court. However, concurrent execution is an exceptional course because it may prejudice the judgment-debtor if the same decree is pursued simultaneously in multiple fora. The court which passed the decree retains control over execution and must be satisfied, on an application seeking permission, that concurrent execution is justified before such process is allowed to proceed.
Conclusion: Prior permission of the court that passed the decree is necessary for simultaneous execution in more than one court, and the execution petitions filed without such permission were not maintainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Concurrent execution of the same decree in more than one court is permissible only under an order of the court that passed the decree, which retains supervisory control and must grant permission before such execution can proceed.