TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CGST Act Appeal Path: Penalty and Tax Confirmation Challenged, Seized Vehicle to be Released During Appeal.</h1> <h3>M/s. TRANSWAYS INDIA TRANSPORT, M/s. SUNRISE METAL INDUSTRIES, M/s. BOKADIA STEEL, M/s. ARHAM STAINLESS, M/s. NAVRATAN STEEL Versus COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, JOINT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU</h3> The petitioner contested the proceedings under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, which imposed a penalty of Rs.21,41,239 and confirmed tax of Rs.3,85,423. ... Maintainability of petition - availability of alternative remedy - demand of tax with penalty - HELD THAT:- In light of the admitted position that the impugned order could be a subject matter of appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, this Court is of the view that the circumstances made out would not make out a case for bypassing the alternative remedy. The petition is disposed off reserving liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned order. If such an appeal is filed within a period of one week, the same to be disposed off within a period of not later four weeks thereafter. The petitioner, however, to co-operate for early disposal of such appeal. Petition disposed off. The petitioner challenged the validity of proceedings under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, involving a penalty of Rs.21,41,239 and confirmed tax of Rs.3,85,423. The court held that the matter should be appealed under Section 107 of the CGST Act, granting the petitioner liberty to file an appeal within one week. The court also directed the release of the seized vehicle pending appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
