Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application seeking expunction of portions of the affidavit in evidence as being beyond the pleadings, and seeking refusal to take on record additional documents filed with the affidavit, was maintainable.
Analysis: Under Order 18 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, examination-in-chief is to be filed by affidavit, and objections to the contents or to documents relied upon are to be recorded before the Local Commissioner and decided by the Court at the stage of final arguments. Order 19 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure confines affidavits to facts within the deponent's knowledge, but the proper course for a party objecting to alleged beyond-pleadings material is to have the objection recorded rather than to seek expunction at the evidence stage. The filing of documents along with an affidavit does not by itself make them admissible, and Order 7 Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits later filing with leave of the Court; admissibility and proof can still be objected to and decided later.
Conclusion: The application was not a proper remedy and was liable to be dismissed; the objections, if any, were to be raised before the Local Commissioner and decided in accordance with law at the appropriate stage.