Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants contravened Section 9(1)(e) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 by placing a sum to the credit of a person resident outside India without the permission of the Reserve Bank of India, and whether the penalty imposed was liable to be interfered with.
Analysis: The amount was admittedly credited in the accounts of a person found to be resident outside India. Section 9(1)(e) prohibits placing any sum to the credit of a non-resident without Reserve Bank permission. No effort to obtain such permission was shown. The appellants were expected to ascertain the residential status of the person with whom they were dealing, and the record did not support the plea that the non-resident status was concealed from them. The material on record therefore established the contravention. The penalty was also found proportionate to the nature and quantum of the violation.
Conclusion: The contravention stood proved and the penalty was upheld. The appeals were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Crediting money to the account of a person resident outside India without Reserve Bank permission constitutes a contravention under Section 9(1)(e) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, and the party dealing with such person must ascertain the residential status before the transaction.