Bail in CGST prosecution granted where custody was unnecessary and liberty prevailed pending testing of allegations.

Bail was granted in a CGST prosecution where the Court weighed the nature of the accusation, the prescribed punishment, the absence of demonstrated recovery proceedings or ascertainment of tax or penalty, and the applicant's limited criminal history. The Court applied settled bail principles and balanced personal liberty against the State's interest, while declining to comment on the merits of the allegations. On that basis, custodial necessity was not made out and continued detention was held unjustified at that stage.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to bail in a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Analysis: The application was examined on the basis of the nature of accusation, the punishment prescribed, the absence of demonstrated recovery proceedings or ascertainment of tax or penalty at that stage, the limited criminal history, and the settled principles governing bail. The Court also noted the need to balance personal liberty against the larger interest of the State while refraining from expressing any opinion on the merits of the accusation.

Conclusion: Bail was granted to the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi: In bail matters, personal liberty may be protected where the allegations are yet to be tested, the custodial necessity is not made out, and the relevant bail factors do not justify continued detention.

---