Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's miscellaneous application seeking recall of the earlier order dismissing the appeal for low tax effect deserved to be allowed on the ground that the tax effect exceeded the monetary limit.
Analysis: The appeal related to disallowance of deduction under section 80P and the amount in dispute was stated to be Rs. 2,65,15,064/-, which exceeded the threshold of Rs. 20 lakhs referred to in the CBDT circular. On that basis, the earlier dismissal of the appeal as involving low tax effect was held to suffer from an apparent error warranting rectification under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Conclusion: The miscellaneous application was allowed and the earlier dismissal order was recalled, with the main appeal directed to be restored for hearing.