Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner was justified in exercising revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the ground that the assessment order wrongly treated donations out of accumulated funds as application of income under section 11.
Analysis: The assessee had admittedly made payments out of accumulated corpus funds to other organisations and sought to characterise them as collaborative contributions. The Tribunal held that there was no meaningful distinction between the terms contribution and donation in the facts of the case. It further found no evidence to show how the recipients accounted for the amounts. Referring to section 11(2), the Tribunal held that amounts accumulated and later donated do not qualify as application of income, and under section 11(3) such utilisation is to be treated as income of the assessee. On that basis, the assessment order was held to suffer from legal error and to cause revenue prejudice.
Conclusion: The assumption of jurisdiction under section 263 was upheld and the assessee's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Donations made out of accumulated income under section 11(2) cannot be treated as application of income, and an assessment order allowing such treatment is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, justifying revision under section 263.