Bail under PMLA: investigative statements, twin conditions, and the woman proviso may be considered at the prima facie stage.

At the bail stage in a money-laundering prosecution, investigative statements, including statements under Section 164 CrPC and Section 50 of PMLA, together with corroborative documentary and digital material, may be considered to form a prima facie view, with their final evidentiary value left for trial. The discussion also explains that bail under Section 45 PMLA depends on satisfying the twin conditions, along with ordinary bail considerations such as the risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. It further notes that the proviso for women is discretionary and does not create an automatic right to bail; its application depends on the facts and the material showing the applicant's role.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether statements of approvers, witnesses and material collected during investigation could be relied upon at the stage of bail; (ii) whether the applicant satisfied the twin conditions for bail under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and the ordinary bail considerations; (iii) whether the applicant, being a woman, was entitled to the benefit of the proviso to Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

Issue (i): whether statements of approvers, witnesses and material collected during investigation could be relied upon at the stage of bail.

Analysis: The Court held that at the stage of arrest, remand and bail, the prosecution is entitled to rely on statements recorded during investigation, including statements under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, along with corroborative documentary and digital material. Such material is only for forming a prima facie view and its final evidentiary value is to be tested at trial. The Court rejected the contention that these statements must be ignored at the bail stage.

Conclusion: The investigative statements and material were held to be admissible for considering bail and could not be discarded at this stage.

Issue (ii): whether the applicant satisfied the twin conditions for bail under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and the ordinary bail considerations.

Analysis: The Court found prima facie material showing the applicant's involvement in the alleged money-laundering activity, including the overall conspiracy, use of proxies, and handling of proceeds of crime. On that basis, it held that there were no reasonable grounds for believing that the applicant was not guilty of the offence. The Court also held that the applicant did not satisfy the triple test because the material indicated a risk of tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses, especially in view of the alleged formatting of mobile phones and the applicant's position and influence. Accordingly, the mandatory conditions for bail under Section 45 were not met.

Conclusion: The twin conditions under Section 45 were not satisfied and bail was declined on ordinary considerations as well.

Issue (iii): whether the applicant, being a woman, was entitled to the benefit of the proviso to Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

Analysis: The Court held that the proviso confers a discretion and does not create an automatic entitlement to bail. It noted that the applicant was an educated and politically influential person, and the material collected by the investigating agencies prima facie indicated a central role in the alleged offence. In those circumstances, the Court held that she could not claim the proviso as a matter of right.

Conclusion: The applicant was held not entitled to the benefit of the proviso to Section 45.

Final Conclusion: No ground for regular bail was made out on the material placed before the Court, and the applications were rejected at this stage.

Ratio Decidendi: At the bail stage in a money-laundering prosecution, prima facie investigative statements and corroborative material may be relied upon to assess involvement, Section 45 imposes mandatory twin conditions, and the woman proviso is discretionary rather than automatic.

---