Non-resident assessee wins appeal on income from services rendered outside India under sections 147 and 144

ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal of a non-resident assessee who derived income from services rendered outside India. The case involved validity of assessment under sections 147 and 144, where the assessee couldn't initially provide verifiable sources for property acquisition investment due to insolvency proceedings against the financier. DRP sustained the addition citing lack of evidence regarding loan credit dates and payments. However, ITAT accepted additional evidence obtained from successor entities after DHFL's insolvency, finding it improper to dismiss a meritorious case without opportunity. The matter was remanded to AO for verification and fresh consideration.

---

---

Issues:
1. Final assessment order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Non-resident individual deriving income from services outside India.
3. Purchase of immovable property and investment in Fixed Deposit without filing income tax return.
4. Addition of unexplained income by Assessing Officer.
5. Objections filed before the Dispute Resolution Panel.
6. Consideration of additional evidence by the Appellate Tribunal.

Analysis:
The Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad, addressed the appeal filed by an individual, a non-resident deriving income from services outside India, against the final assessment order for the assessment year 2015-16. The individual did not file an income tax return as the income was not taxable in India under section 5 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. However, the Assessing Officer noticed property purchase and investments, leading to a proposed addition of unexplained income. The Dispute Resolution Panel sustained the addition due to lack of evidence establishing the source of funds for property acquisition. The individual contended that necessary documents were not readily available during assessments by lower authorities.

The individual sought to admit additional evidence, including housing loan statements and bank account statements, to clarify the payment schedule and source of funds for property purchase. The Appellate Tribunal considered the insolvency proceedings against the financier and the subsequent takeover by another entity, which delayed the procurement of necessary documents. Despite opposition from the Revenue, the Tribunal allowed the additional evidence submission, emphasizing the importance of providing a fair opportunity to the individual to substantiate their case.

Ultimately, the Appellate Tribunal set aside the previous orders, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the additional evidence and make a decision in accordance with the law after affording the individual a proper opportunity. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes, ensuring a fair and just consideration of the case. The decision was pronounced in open court on May 11, 2023, highlighting the importance of due process and the right to present relevant evidence in tax assessment proceedings.

---