Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Municipal Corporation cannot acquire property under Section 352 without prescribed procedure violating constitutional property rights</h1> <h3>KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. Versus BIMAL KUMAR SHAH & ORS.</h3> KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. Versus BIMAL KUMAR SHAH & ORS. - 2024 INSC 435, (2024) 10 SCC 533 Issues Involved:1. Legality and validity of acquisition of the property under Section 352 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980.2. Provision for compensation under Section 363 of the Act.3. Constitutional right to property under Article 300A.4. Procedural requirements for compulsory acquisition of property.5. The duty of the state to acquire property only for public purpose.Detailed Analysis:Legality and Validity of Acquisition under Section 352:The Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC) claimed to have acquired the property of respondent no. 1 under Section 352 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. The High Court held that Section 352 does not confer the power of compulsory acquisition of immovable property. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, stating that Section 352 merely allows the Municipal Commissioner to identify land for public purposes but does not provide the process for acquisition. The acquisition process must be initiated under Section 537 of the Act, which requires the Municipal Commissioner to apply to the Government to acquire land for public purposes.Provision for Compensation under Section 363:The appellant-Corporation argued that Section 363 of the Act provides for compensation when land is acquired under Section 352. However, the High Court clarified, and the Supreme Court agreed, that Section 363 relates to compensation upon agreement and not for compulsory acquisition. Thus, invoking Section 352 for compulsory acquisition without following the proper procedure under Section 537 is invalid.Constitutional Right to Property under Article 300A:The Supreme Court emphasized that under Article 300A of the Constitution, no person shall be deprived of property except by authority of law. The Court identified seven sub-rights integral to the constitutional right to property: the right to notice, the right to be heard, the right to a reasoned decision, the duty to acquire only for public purpose, the right of restitution or fair compensation, the right to an efficient and expeditious process, and the right of conclusion. Section 352 of the Act does not provide these procedural safeguards, making it unconstitutional for compulsory acquisition.Procedural Requirements for Compulsory Acquisition:The Court highlighted that a valid acquisition must comply with fair procedures, including notice, hearing, reasoned decision, public purpose, fair compensation, efficient process, and conclusion. These procedures are essential to ensure that the acquisition is just, fair, and reasonable. The absence of these procedures in Section 352 renders it inadequate for compulsory acquisition.Duty of the State to Acquire Property Only for Public Purpose:The Court reiterated that compulsory acquisition must be for a public purpose. The appellant-Corporation failed to demonstrate that the acquisition under Section 352 was for a public purpose, as required by law. The proper procedure under Section 537, which involves government discretion and adherence to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was not followed.Conclusion:The Supreme Court concluded that Section 352 does not confer the power of compulsory acquisition and that the proper procedure under Section 537 must be followed. The Court dismissed the appeal by the appellant-Corporation, affirming the High Court's decision and awarding costs of Rs. 5,00,000/- to respondent no. 1. The judgment emphasized the importance of procedural safeguards and constitutional rights in the process of compulsory acquisition of property.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found