Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a bona fide purchaser of excisable goods can be penalised or the goods confiscated for alleged defects in the gate pass and labelling attributable to the manufacturer under the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The relevant rules placed the obligation regarding proper gate pass entries and prescribed labelling on the manufacturer, particularly under the self-removal procedure. The purchaser had no role in preparing the gate pass or in affixing the labels, and the department had already proceeded against the manufacturer for the irregularity. The quasi-penal nature of the provisions required the alleged offence to be strictly and fully brought home to the person proceeded against. On the facts, the purchaser was unconnected with the alleged misdescription or mixed labels, and the department had not established any independent offence by him.
Conclusion: The purchaser could not be penalised or subjected to confiscation for the same alleged irregularity, and the order was unsustainable insofar as it related to him.