Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether coercive action under the SARFAESI proceedings against the guarantor's residential mortgaged property should be deferred and possession restored upon deposit and consideration of a request for one time settlement or rephasement.
Analysis: The petitioner was the guarantor and the secured asset was his residential house. The Bank had already taken possession and intended to auction the property, but it also accepted that if a substantial amount was deposited within a fixed time and an application for one time settlement or rephasement was made, the request could be considered under the existing guidelines. In these circumstances, protection from immediate coercive steps was warranted pending the Bank's decision on the settlement request.
Conclusion: The petitioner was granted conditional relief. On deposit of Rs.10,00,000 within four weeks and filing of an application for one time settlement or rephasement, the Bank was required to consider the request and no coercive action was to be taken until a decision was made.