Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (1) TMI 1448 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Section 56(2)(viib) requires proper FMV determination under Rule 11UA before taxing share premium receipts as income The ITAT Bangalore held that section 56(2)(viib) regarding share premium receipts requires determination of Fair Market Value (FMV) using prescribed ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Section 56(2)(viib) requires proper FMV determination under Rule 11UA before taxing share premium receipts as income

                            The ITAT Bangalore held that section 56(2)(viib) regarding share premium receipts requires determination of Fair Market Value (FMV) using prescribed methods under Rule 11UA before taxing excess consideration as income from other sources. The AO incorrectly used face value as deemed FMV without proper valuation. Since neither the AO nor CIT(A) determined FMV through prescribed methods, the matter was remanded to CIT(A) for proper FMV determination following statutory procedures. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. CIT(A) order contrary to law, facts, and circumstances.
                            2. Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer in confirming addition of share premium as income.
                            3. Applicability of section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                            4. Requirement of share valuation report.
                            5. Justification of share premium and valuation method.
                            6. Levy of interest under section 234B of the Act.

                            Analysis:

                            Issue 1: CIT(A) order contrary to law, facts, and circumstances
                            The appeal raised concerns about the CIT(A) order being contrary to law, facts, and prejudicial to the appellant's interest. The grounds for appeal highlighted the perceived injustice and lack of equity in the decision. The appellant contended that the CIT(A) failed to appreciate the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction and the principles of natural justice and fair play.

                            Issue 2: Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer in confirming addition of share premium as income
                            The Assessing Officer's decision to treat the share premium received by the company as income from other sources under section 56(2)(viib) of the Act was challenged. The appellant argued that the AO did not follow the required valuation process and rejected the claim based on insufficient documentary evidence. The AO's approach was criticized for lacking a specific valuation method and scientific analysis, leading to the addition of share premium as income.

                            Issue 3: Applicability of section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
                            The core issue revolved around the interpretation and application of section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant contended that the provisions should not apply to shares issued in the assessment year 2011-2012, as they were introduced in AY 2013-14. However, the authorities upheld that the share premium received during the relevant assessment year is taxable under section 56(2)(viib), irrespective of when the shares were issued.

                            Issue 4: Requirement of share valuation report
                            The necessity of a share valuation report under the relevant provisions of the Act was debated. The appellant argued that no such report was required at the time of share allotment. However, the authorities emphasized the importance of proper valuation methods and the lack of scientific basis in the valuation provided by the appellant.

                            Issue 5: Justification of share premium and valuation method
                            The appellant's attempts to justify the share premium were scrutinized, with the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) questioning the validity of the valuation method used. The authorities highlighted the need for accurate valuation as per prescribed methods to determine the fair market value of shares, especially in cases involving excess consideration received by the issuing company.

                            Issue 6: Levy of interest under section 234B of the Act
                            Lastly, the imposition of interest under section 234B of the Act was contested. The appellant challenged the CIT(A)'s decision to uphold the levy of interest, raising concerns about the correctness of the assessment and the application of relevant provisions.

                            In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of establishing the fair market value of shares as per prescribed methods before invoking section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act. The case underscores the significance of proper valuation practices and adherence to legal provisions in determining the tax implications of share premium transactions.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found