Cost of production expenses for tele serials ruled as revenue expenditure under section 37, not capital expenditure

ITAT Chennai held that cost of production expenses for tele serials constitutes revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure. The tribunal ruled that such expenses do not create enduring benefits or assets for assessees engaged in production and exhibition of tele serials. The decision was supported by Television Eighteen India Ltd. case and CBDT circular provisions. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made by Assessing Officer, allowing production costs as revenue expenditure under section 37 of Income Tax Act, 1961, even when revenue from exhibition spans multiple years.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of production expenses of tele serials as capital expenditure.
2. Appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding assessment year 2009-10.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Disallowance of production expenses of tele serials as capital expenditure
The Revenue raised grounds of appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the disallowance of Rs. 2,33,58,021/- on expenditure incurred on the cost of production of tele serials. The Assessing Officer disallowed the expenses claimed by the assessee, considering them as capital expenditure. The Revenue contended that the enduring benefits of tele serials, such as re-telecasting and dubbing, make the expenditure capital in nature. However, the CIT(A) deleted the additions, holding that expenses for production of tele serials are revenue in nature and should be allowed as and when incurred. The CIT(A) relied on various judicial precedents, including a decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, emphasizing that such expenses are revenue in nature and do not lead to the creation of any asset. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the production expenses of tele serials are revenue in nature and not capital expenditure. The Tribunal emphasized that even if revenue from the exhibition of tele serials is spread over multiple years, the expenses should be allowed as revenue expenditure when incurred.

Issue 2: Appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)
The appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2009-10 was dismissed. The Tribunal considered that the cost of production of tele serials and films should be treated as revenue expenditure, following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. The Tribunal highlighted that the major expenditure of the assessee was related to the production and exhibition of tele serials, and such expenses should be treated as revenue in nature. The Tribunal emphasized that the cost of production of tele serials does not result in enduring benefits or the creation of assets, supporting the view that it should be considered as revenue expenditure. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the findings of the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue.

In conclusion, the Tribunal affirmed that the production expenses of tele serials should be treated as revenue expenditure and not as capital expenditure, as they do not lead to the creation of assets or enduring benefits. The decision was based on established judicial precedents and the nature of expenses incurred for the production and exhibition of tele serials.

---