Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the blocking of the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 was liable to be interfered with in writ jurisdiction.
Analysis: The petitioner challenged the blocking of input tax credit on the ground of absence of prior notice and hearing. The Department justified the action by stating that the registered taxpayer was found not to be functioning at the declared place of business and that prima facie ineligible credit had been availed. The Court accepted that the action was taken under the enabling power in Rule 86A, which permits restriction on use of the electronic credit ledger where there are reasons to believe that input tax credit has been fraudulently availed or is ineligible, including where invoices are issued by a registered person found not to be conducting business from the registered premises.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not entertained and the challenge to the blocking of the Electronic Credit Ledger failed.