Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rejection of the declared transaction value and adoption of valuation based on a Chartered Engineer's report, without sequential compliance with the Customs Valuation Rules, was legally sustainable.
Analysis: The dispute concerned valuation of imported goods and the validity of the Department's approach in discarding the invoice value. The record showed that the Department relied on an email and Internet-based information, but did not bring contemporaneous import evidence of identical or similar goods at a higher price. The Chartered Engineer's valuation was based on local market prices in India and on assumptions for certain items, which was found to be an improper basis for determining assessable value. The applicable legal framework required the declared transaction value to be accepted unless it was shown to be unacceptable, and if rejected, the Department had to proceed sequentially through the valuation rules rather than directly invoking the residual method.
Conclusion: The rejection of the transaction value and the valuation adopted on the basis of the Chartered Engineer's report were held to be unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Declared transaction value cannot be rejected without cogent evidence of undervaluation, and the customs authority must apply the valuation rules sequentially before resorting to the residual method.