Section 69A addition for unexplained money from bank credits rejected when non-resident adequately explained all entries

ITAT Delhi held that section 69A addition for unexplained money based on bank account credit entries was unsustainable. The non-resident assessee was not obliged to maintain books of account in India, with only interest income from bank accounts and tax refunds. Even treating bank statements as books of account, section 69A was inapplicable as transactions were properly recorded. The assessee adequately explained each credit entry's source in NRO/NRE accounts. Commissioner (Appeals) improperly rejected additional evidence on flimsy grounds. Cash deposits were acceptably explained as originating from earlier withdrawals given their proximity. Appeal allowed.

---

---

Issues involved:
The issues involved in the judgment are the challenge to the addition made under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Act.

Addition under section 69A:
The appellant, a non-resident individual, contested the addition of Rs.1,32,25,533/- under section 69A of the Act. The Assessing Officer added back the amount as unexplained money based on credit entries in the bank account. The appellant explained the source of deposits, but the Assessing Officer was not convinced. The appellant argued that as a non-resident, he was not obligated to maintain books of account in India, and the credit entries were duly recorded in the bank statement. The Tribunal observed that one of the conditions for section 69A was not satisfied as the appellant was a non-resident and the provisions of section 69A were not applicable. The Tribunal further analyzed the merits of the issue and found that the source of each credit entry in the bank accounts was properly explained by the appellant. Therefore, the addition made under section 69A was deemed unsustainable on merits, and the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs.1,32,25,533/-.

Levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C:
The appellant also raised the issue of the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Act. The Tribunal noted that the levy of interest is consequential in nature, and there was no requirement for adjudication on this issue. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the addition under section 69A was deleted.

---