Valuation under excise rules must follow actual direct sales where no wholesale market exists.

Where excisable goods are sold directly to buyers and no wholesale market exists, the direct-sale price cannot be treated as a wholesale price for valuation purposes. On the factual findings accepted by the Collector (Appeals) and CEGAT, sales to dealers were limited and did not establish a wholesale market, so valuation had to proceed under Rule 6(a) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975. The CEGAT's valuation was therefore upheld and required no interference.

---

---

Issues: Whether Rule 6(a) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 applied where the goods were sold directly to buyers and no wholesale market existed.

Analysis: The sales pattern showed direct sales to buyers and sales through dealers only in a limited territory after a particular date. The factual findings of the Collector (Appeals) and the CEGAT were that there was no wholesale market for the goods. In such circumstances, the price of direct sales could not be treated as a wholesale price, and valuation had to proceed under Rule 6(a).

Conclusion: Rule 6(a) was applicable, and the valuation adopted by the CEGAT called for no interference.

Ratio Decidendi: Where no wholesale market exists for the excisable goods, valuation cannot be based on a notional wholesale price and must be determined under the applicable valuation rule governing such sales.

---