Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether action under Section 4-I(1)(a) or Section 4-I(1)(c) of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 was attracted to an import made under Open General Licence without any licence or declaration, and whether the impugned penalty and disqualification were therefore sustainable.
Analysis: Section 4-I(1)(a) applies where goods are imported under a licence or letter of authority, while Section 4-I(1)(c) applies where a declaration is made for the purpose of obtaining a licence. The import in question was made under OGL without any licence and without any declaration for obtaining a licence. Since the factual basis necessary to invoke either provision was absent, the statutory provision relied upon by the authorities did not apply.
Conclusion: The action under Section 4-I(1) was not attracted and the impugned orders imposing penalty and disqualification were unsustainable, in favour of the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: A penal action under a specific import-control provision cannot be sustained unless the essential statutory preconditions for invoking that provision are actually present on the facts.