Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order determining tax under Section 73(9) of the Goods and Services Tax enactments could be sustained when passed without granting an opportunity of personal hearing.
Analysis: The Court applied the settled principle that, where tax liability is determined, the affected person must ordinarily be afforded a personal hearing before the adjudication order is passed. Relying on the earlier decision on the requirement of hearing in tax adjudication, the Court held that the same safeguard governs determination of tax under Section 73(9) as well. Since no opportunity of oral hearing had been given, the impugned order could not stand.
Conclusion: The tax determination order was unsustainable and was set aside, with the matter remitted to the authority for fresh decision after granting personal hearing.