Domestic Supplier Wins Appeals; Tribunal Grants Exemption Relief, Rejects Importer-Based Condition Argument by Department.

The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals and granting consequential relief to the Appellant, a domestic supplier, who availed exemption under the Central Excise Notification. It held that the Appellant fulfilled the necessary conditions for exemption, rejecting the Department's claim of wrongful exemption based on conditions applicable to importers.

---

---

Issues:
The case involves the Appellant M/s ACI Industrial Organic Pvt. Ltd appealing against Orders related to the clearance of excisable goods under Chapter 29 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and availing Cenvat Credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, specifically regarding the exemption from payment of Central Excise duty for supplying field chemicals to ONGC under International Competitive Bidding.

Brief Facts and Arguments:
The Appellant, a domestic supplier, cleared field chemicals to ONGC under International Competitive Bidding, availing exemption under Central Excise Notification No. 12/2012 - CE. The Department alleged that the Appellant wrongfully availed benefits under the Central Excise Notification by not fulfilling conditions prescribed for importers, which the Appellant contested based on the Customs Notification and the nature of their supply.

The Appellant argued that as domestic suppliers, they are not obligated to fulfill conditions specific for importers, citing a previous judgment and emphasizing that they fulfilled the conditions required for exemption under the relevant notifications.

The Department reiterated its findings from the impugned order, maintaining the position taken against the Appellant.

Judgment:
After considering the submissions and records, the Tribunal found that the Appellant supplied goods under International Competitive Bidding to ONGC and availed exemption under the Central Excise Notification, which was not disputed. The dispute centered around a specific condition of the Customs Notification, which the Department used to deny the exemption claiming the Appellant did not provide an affidavit as a sub-contractor of ONGC.

The Tribunal noted that the condition in question pertained to importers, while the Appellants were domestic suppliers, and there was no dispute regarding the goods' eligibility for exemption. Citing a relevant precedent, the Tribunal held that domestic suppliers fulfilling conditions for exemption are eligible, rejecting the Department's claim of wrongful exemption.

Therefore, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief, if any, in accordance with the law, based on the established eligibility of the Appellants for exemption under the Central Excise Notification.

The judgment was pronounced in the open court on 15.03.2024 by the Hon'ble Members of the Tribunal.

---