Prospective operation of section 200A bars section 234E fee for earlier TDS periods; limitation dismissals need a hearing

Fee under section 234E could not be levied through processing under section 200A(1)(c) for TDS statements relating to periods before 1 June 2015, because the enabling amendment was prospective and did not authorise such adjustment for earlier quarters. The note also records that appeals dismissed as time-barred could not stand where the assessee had not been heard on limitation; those matters were remanded for fresh consideration on limitation and merits after affording an opportunity of hearing.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether fee under section 234E could be levied through processing under section 200A(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for periods prior to 01.06.2015. (ii) Whether the appeals dismissed as time-barred required reconsideration after affording an opportunity of hearing on limitation.

Issue (i): Whether fee under section 234E could be levied through processing under section 200A(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for periods prior to 01.06.2015.

Analysis: The levy was held to be unsustainable for the relevant periods because the enabling clause in section 200A(1)(c) was introduced only with effect from 01.06.2015. The provision was treated as prospective, and fee under section 234E could not be imposed for TDS statements processed for earlier quarters.

Conclusion: The levy of fee under section 234E for the periods in question was set aside in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the appeals dismissed as time-barred required reconsideration after affording an opportunity of hearing on limitation.

Analysis: The dismissal on limitation was interfered with because the assessee was not afforded an opportunity to explain the delay. The matters were therefore required to be examined afresh by the first appellate authority after hearing the assessee on limitation and on merits.

Conclusion: The limitation-based dismissal was set aside and the matters were remanded for fresh adjudication in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The order sustained the assessee's challenge on the merits in one appeal and remitted the remaining matters for fresh decision after hearing, resulting in partial success for the assessee overall.

Ratio Decidendi: Fee under section 234E cannot be levied through processing under section 200A for periods before the enabling amendment became operative, and a dismissal on limitation without hearing the appellant cannot be sustained.

---