Judicial Review Overturns GST Registration Cancellation, Restores Procedural Fairness and Taxpayer Rights Under Section 29

HC ruled that GST registration cancellation was improper. The court modified the original order, cancelling registration from the petitioner's initial application date. Respondents were allowed to pursue tax recovery and take appropriate legal steps. The decision emphasized procedural fairness and proper documentation in administrative actions related to tax registration.

---

---

Issues involved:
The issues involved in this case are the impugning of a Show Cause Notice and an order cancelling GST registration, the rejection of an application seeking cancellation of registration, the issuance of a Show Cause Notice based on alleged fraud, misstatement, and suppression of facts, and the lack of reasons provided in the notices and orders.

Impugning of Show Cause Notice and Order Cancelling GST Registration:
The petitioner challenged a Show Cause Notice dated 06.06.2023 and an order dated 15.06.2023 cancelling their GST registration. The petitioner had initially applied for cancellation of registration on 12.04.2023 due to business discontinuation, which was rejected. The subsequent cancellation order was based on the petitioner being found non-existent at the premises during an inspection. However, the court found this ground unsustainable as the petitioner had already applied for cancellation due to business closure before the inspection date.

Allegations of Fraud and Misstatement:
The Show Cause Notice issued on 06.06.2023 alleged that the registration was obtained through fraud, willful misstatement, and suppression of facts. The respondents claimed that the petitioner wrongfully claimed Input Tax Credit without proper documentation. However, the court noted that the notices and orders did not specifically mention any wrongful claims, emphasizing the need for proper procedures and opportunities for the authorities to take action in accordance with the law.

Lack of Reasons in Notices and Orders:
The court highlighted the lack of reasons provided in the Show Cause Notice and the order of cancellation. The Show Cause Notice did not mention the name and designation of the issuing officer, and the cancellation order did not offer any specific reasons for the decision, merely referring to the previous notice. The court emphasized that registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively without proper objective criteria and satisfaction by the proper officer.

Decision and Modification of Orders:
The court modified the impugned order and the Show Cause Notice, deeming the registration to be cancelled from the date of the petitioner's initial application for cancellation on 12.04.2023. The petitioner was instructed to comply with the necessary requirements under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The respondents were allowed to take steps for recovery of any tax, penalty, or interest due, including retrospective cancellation of GST registration, in accordance with the law.

Conclusion:
The petition was disposed of with the registration deemed cancelled from the date of the petitioner's initial application. The rights and contentions of the parties were reserved, and the respondents were permitted to take further actions for recovery as per the law.

---