Educational institutions qualify for Works Contract Services benefits despite free material supplies under service tax

CESTAT Chennai held that construction services involving both material supply and service rendering constitute composite services under Works Contract Services (WCS), not Commercial and Industrial Construction Services (CICS). For periods before 01.06.2007, CICS demand cannot be sustained per SC precedent in Larsen and Toubro. Post-01.06.2007 demands must be under WCS only. The tribunal rejected department's classification of educational institutions under CICS and upheld notification benefits despite free material supplies, citing SC ruling in Bhayana Builders. Appeal disposed with demand dropped for spinning mill construction services.

---

---

Issues involved:
The judgment involves issues related to the demand of service tax for construction services provided to educational institutions and spinning mills, as well as the applicability of Notification No. 01/2006.

Issue 1: Construction services to educational institutions
The period involved in the appeals ranged from April 2005 to March 2012. The demand was raised under the category of 'Commercial and Industrial Construction Services' (CICS) for constructions provided to educational institutions. The Tribunal analyzed the nature of the services provided, considering them as composite services involving both supply of materials and rendering of services. It was held that for the entire period, the demand should be under Works Contract Services (WCS) rather than CICS. The Tribunal referred to previous judgments, including the case of Real Value Promoters, to support this conclusion. The demand raised under CICS was deemed unsustainable and was set aside.

Issue 2: Construction services to spinning mills
For the period from 2005 to March 2010, a demand was raised on construction services provided to spinning mills, denying the benefit under Notification No. 1/2006 due to alleged receipt of free supplies of materials. The Tribunal referred to the case law of CST Vs. Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd., which held that even if free supplies were received, the benefit of abatement under the Notification cannot be denied. The Tribunal found the decision to drop the demand in respect of construction services to spinning mills as legal and proper.

Conclusion:
The judgment sustained the impugned order in one appeal related to construction services to educational institutions, dismissing the department's appeal. In the other appeals concerning construction services to spinning mills, the impugned orders were set aside. As a result, the appeals filed by the assessee were allowed with consequential relief, while the department's appeal was dismissed.

---