Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Can Filler, Fruit Feeder and Ripple Machine were accessories to the continuous ice cream freezer or independent machines classifiable separately under the Customs Tariff.
Analysis: The imported freezer was accepted as refrigerating equipment classifiable under Heading 84.15(1). The dispute concerned the other three items. On the material before the authorities, those machines were found to be ready assembled units, capable of independent functioning, and not dependent accessories merely because they could be connected with the freezer. Their function was to improve or diversify ice cream production, but that did not alter their essential character as separate machines. The authorities therefore treated them according to their own function and not as part of the freezer.
Conclusion: The items were correctly classified as independent machines and not as accessories; the assessee's challenge failed.