Appeal Dismissed for Non-Prosecution; Tribunal Upholds Addition u/s 50C of Income Tax Act Due to Discrepancies.

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee due to non-prosecution, citing the absence of supporting documents and the assessee's repeated non-appearance. The Tribunal upheld the addition under section 50C of the Income Tax Act, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities, given the discrepancies in payment details and unresolved property ownership issues.

---

---

Issues involved:
The appeal against the ex parte appellate order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) related to the assessment order under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2018-19.

Assessment Proceedings and Dispute:
The assessee, an individual deriving income from various sources, filed a return for the Asst. Year 2018-19. The scrutiny assessment was initiated, focusing on the investment in immovable property and invoking section 50C valuation. The assessee explained the purchase details and the ongoing dispute with the sellers, emphasizing that section 50C should not apply due to the unresolved transaction. However, the Assessing Officer disregarded the explanation and added the differential amount as the assessee's income, demanding tax accordingly.

Grounds of Appeal and NFAC Decision:
The aggrieved assessee appealed to the National Faceless Appeal Centre, challenging the addition made under section 50C. The appeal highlighted discrepancies in the valuation and the ongoing dispute affecting the property's transfer. Despite multiple notices, the assessee failed to provide submissions, leading to the confirmation of the addition by the NFAC. The appeal was dismissed based on the discrepancy between the declared payment and the purchase deed's details, upholding the Assessing Officer's decision.

Appellate Tribunal Decision:
The assessee further appealed the NFAC decision, arguing against the addition under section 50C due to the unresolved ownership transfer. However, the repeated non-appearance of the assessee during hearings and the lack of supporting documents led the Tribunal to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. The Tribunal noted the absence of crucial evidence and the assessee's consistent non-engagement in the proceedings, ultimately affirming the lower authorities' decision.

Conclusion:
The appeal filed by the Assessee was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal due to non-prosecution, emphasizing the lack of supporting materials and the assessee's persistent non-appearance throughout the proceedings. The Tribunal upheld the addition made under section 50C, considering the discrepancies in the payment details and the unresolved dispute regarding the property ownership transfer.

---