Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether flexi tanks imported by the appellant were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 104/94-Cus dated 16.03.1994 as durable containers, and whether the matter required fresh examination of the nature and characteristics of the goods.
Analysis: The exemption applied to containers of durable nature subject to execution of bond and re-export within the stipulated period. The denial of benefit was based mainly on the view that flexi tanks were not durable and on the Board Circular No. 69/2002-Customs dated 25.10.2002. Durable nature was treated as a relative concept, to be assessed from the material, intended use, endurance, and ability to withstand wear and tear for the period of use. The record did not show a proper examination of the product's nature and characteristics, and the issue depended on factual verification supported by test reports or technical literature.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration after proper factual and technical verification, and no finding was recorded on the merits of the exemption claim.