Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Manufacturer Challenges GST Notices, Seeks Fair Hearing on Equipment Classification and Proposed Tax Rate Increase</h1> <h3>M/s. SL Lumax Limited (Represented by its Chief Financial Officer Shri. G. Murugan) Versus Deputy Commissioner of State Taxes-II, Chennai</h3> M/s. SL Lumax Limited (Represented by its Chief Financial Officer Shri. G. Murugan) Versus Deputy Commissioner of State Taxes-II, Chennai - 2024 (83) ... Issues involved: Challenge to show cause notices regarding classification of goods under GST laws.Summary:In a series of writ petitions, the petitioner contested show cause notices challenging the classification of goods under GST laws. The petitioner, engaged in manufacturing electrical equipment for motor vehicles, had been paying taxes at 18% under Chapter 8512 since November 2017. However, an intimation was received in December 2023 stating the goods should be classified under Chapter 8708, leading to the issuance of show cause notices in January 2024.The petitioner argued that the notices were issued with a predetermined view regarding classification, citing conflicting notes under Section XVII and the need to interpret them with reference to HSN Explanatory Notes. Reference was made to a Supreme Court judgment and customs instructions emphasizing consideration of all facts before classification. The respondent, represented by the Additional Government Pleader, contended that classification should be determined by the assessing officer and that show cause notices are just initial steps in the assessment process.The assessing officer's proposal in the show cause notices to levy taxes at 28% for certain periods raised concerns of pre-judgment. The court emphasized the importance of considering HSN Explanatory Notes and other relevant material before concluding the assessment. The petitions were disposed of with directions for the petitioner to respond to the notices, ensuring a fair opportunity for discussion and assessment by the officer.