Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petitions challenging GST summons, intimations or show cause notices relating to seigniorage fee and mining lease amounts should be disposed of by permitting the petitioners to file replies and by leaving the other issues to be dealt with in accordance with law.
Analysis: The petitions were disposed of by following the earlier Division Bench directions in the connected batch of cases. The petitioners were permitted to submit their replies to the summons, intimations or show cause notices within four weeks. The authority was left free to proceed with the assessment proceedings on other issues in accordance with law, while the petitioners' challenge on the seigniorage fee and mining lease issue was aligned with the course adopted in the earlier batch.
Conclusion: The writ petitions were disposed of by granting time to file replies and by permitting the authorities to continue proceedings on other issues in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The matter was concluded without any adjudication on the GST liability itself, and the petitioners were left to pursue their objections in the pending proceedings.