Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner made out a case for anticipatory bail on the basis of an apprehension of arrest while facing summons issued under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The request for anticipatory bail was examined against the settled requirement under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 that the applicant must show a genuine and objective reason to believe that arrest is likely. The summons issued under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 were treated as a lawful exercise of power for inquiry, requiring attendance, statement, and production of documents. Statements recorded in customs inquiry were held to have evidentiary significance and a person summoned under Section 108 was not, by that reason alone, treated as an accused entitled to avoid compliance. The power of arrest under Section 104 of the Customs Act, 1962 was noted to be circumscribed by statutory safeguards, and no blanket protection against arrest could be granted merely because summons had been issued.
Conclusion: The petitioner failed to establish a well-founded apprehension of arrest and was not entitled to anticipatory bail.
Ratio Decidendi: A person who is lawfully summoned under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 for inquiry cannot obtain anticipatory bail merely on the basis of a speculative fear of arrest, unless concrete and objective grounds show a genuine likelihood of arrest.