CENVAT credit on input services for gas refilling and transportation affirmed, denial set aside and credit allowed.

CENVAT credit on input services for refilling gases and conversion from liquid to gaseous state was contested; the reasoning affirms that where services qualify as input services, credit must be allowed absent discrepancy in service tax payment or documentary defects, and transportation-related services integral to manufacture are eligible; there is no requirement of a one-to-one correlation between specific input services and manufacturing output, and denial of credit without basis must be set aside. Reliance on precedent recognising credit for outward transportation when freight is included supports allowance of the credit.

---

---

Issues:
The judgment involves the issue of denial of CENVAT Credit on input services to the appellant by the Department, specifically focusing on the activity of refilling various gases in liquid states from bulk containers into smaller containers and whether this activity amounts to manufacture.

Summary:
The Appellant, a manufacturer of various gases, availed CENVAT Credit on duty paid on inputs and Service Tax paid on input services as per the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Department contended that the refilling of gases from bulk containers to retail containers does not amount to manufacture, leading to the denial of credit on input services. The Show Cause Notice raised a demand of Rs.29,26,868/- for the credit availed on input services. The Original Authority dropped the demand on inputs but confirmed the demand on input services. The appellant appealed to the Tribunal challenging the denial of credit on input services.

The appellant argued that the input services used were in relation to the manufacturing activity, including inward and outward transportation of goods. The Department claimed that the appellant failed to establish a nexus between the services and the manufacture of excisable goods. The Tribunal examined the issue and found that the services qualified as input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Adjudicating Authority's denial of credit on input services was deemed unjustified as there was no discrepancy in payment or documentation. The Tribunal cited a previous case to support the eligibility of credit on outward transportation services when freight charges are included in the taxable value.

Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order disallowing the credit of Rs.29,26,868/- on input services. However, the reversal of Rs.1,81,758/- by the appellant on exempted goods was sustained. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any, as per law.

---