TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court rejects petition after 272-day delay; question of law remains unresolved, related applications dismissed.</h1> <h3>PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 Versus ANUPAMA MOHAPATRA</h3> SC dismissed a special leave petition due to a substantial delay of 272 days in its filing. The application requesting condonation of this delay was also ... Delay in filling appeal before SC - Denial of claim for benefit of Section 10(38) of the Act and denial of an opportunity to cross examine the entry providers by revenue - substantial question of law or facts - as decided by HC [2023 (2) TMI 392 - ORISSA HIGH COURT] ITAT was justified in accepting the plea of the Assessee that the failure to adhere the principles of natural justice went to the root of the matter. Also, the CBDT circular that permitted to the Assessee to file revised returns if he omitted to make a claim was also not noticed by the AO. HELD THAT:- There is gross delay of 272 days in filing the special leave petition. The explanation offered is not sufficient in law to condone the delay. Hence, the application seeking condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently, the special leave petition is also dismissed keeping open the question of law, if any. Pending application(s) stand disposed of. The Supreme Court dismissed a special leave petition due to a gross delay of 272 days in filing it. The application seeking condonation of delay was also dismissed. The question of law remains open, and pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
