Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
HC allowed writ petition challenging delay in filing revocation application. Court found reasons for 8-day delay satisfactory, considering Aadhar verification issues and partial tax deposit. Impugned order dated 07.09.2023 was set aside, with the miscellaneous petition closed.
Issues involved: Challenge to impugned order on delay in filing revocation application and condonation of delay.
Summary:
Delay in filing revocation application: The writ petition challenged the impugned order passed by the respondent due to a delay of 8 days in filing the application for revocation. The delay was attributed to Aadhar verification and the petitioner's inability to upload the application. The petitioner contended that they had filed "NIL" returns indicating no duty liability, while the respondent claimed a duty liability of Rs2,48,856. Additionally, the petitioner had deposited Rs.58,000 towards tax dues for filing the revocation application.
Condonation of delay: After hearing both parties and examining the materials on record, the Court found the reasons for delay satisfactory. The Court held that the delay was condonable and set aside the impugned order dated 07.09.2023. The writ petition was allowed, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
