Cooperative society's interest income from deposits with cooperative bank qualifies for Section 80P(2)(d) deduction ITAT Chandigarh allowed a cooperative society's appeal regarding disallowance under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest income on deposits with Kangra Central ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Cooperative society's interest income from deposits with cooperative bank qualifies for Section 80P(2)(d) deduction
ITAT Chandigarh allowed a cooperative society's appeal regarding disallowance under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest income on deposits with Kangra Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. The tribunal held that Section 80P(2)(d) requires only two conditions: income must be interest earned by a cooperative society from investment, and such investment must be with another cooperative society. The tribunal clarified that Section 80P(2)(4) applies only to cooperative banks claiming deductions, not cooperative societies placing deposits with cooperative banks. Since the assessee was a registered cooperative society earning interest from deposits with another registered cooperative society, the deduction was properly allowable under Section 80P(2)(d).
Issues Involved: 1. Delay in filing the appeal. 2. Disallowance of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Summary:
Delay in Filing the Appeal: At the outset, it was noted that there was a delay of 3 days in filing the appeal. After hearing both parties and reviewing the affidavit filed by the assessee, the Tribunal found a reasonable cause for the delay and thus condoned it, admitting the appeal for adjudication.
Disallowance of Deduction under Section 80P(2)(d): The assessee, a cooperative society, challenged the action of the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in sustaining the disallowance of Rs. 20,51,316/- claimed under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The assessee had earned interest income on deposits placed with Kangra Central Cooperative Bank (KCCB) Ltd. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the deduction, arguing that the interest income was from a cooperative bank and not a cooperative society, citing the Karnataka High Court decision in Totagars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. vs. PCIT.
The CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi upheld the AO's order, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Limited, which held that a Cooperative Bank is a commercial bank and does not fall under the purview of a Cooperative Society as per Section 80P(2)(d).
Tribunal's Findings: The Tribunal referred to its own findings in a similar case, Jagadhri Co-operative Marketing Cum Processing Society Ltd. vs. The Pr. CIT, where it held that for Section 80P(2)(d), the income should be interest or dividend earned by a Cooperative Society from investments with another Cooperative Society. The Tribunal emphasized that the statute requires only these two conditions and nothing more.
The Tribunal also noted that the term "co-operative society" as defined under section 2(19) of the Act includes societies registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912, or any other law in force. It found that the AO had duly examined the facts and allowed the deduction for interest income from Yamuna Nagar Central Co-op Bank Ltd., treating it as a cooperative society.
The Tribunal further cited the jurisdictional Punjab & Haryana High Court decision in CIT vs. Doaba Co-op Sugar Mills Ltd., which held that the nature and source of investment are irrelevant for claiming deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) as long as the income is derived from investments with another cooperative society.
Conclusion: The Tribunal concluded that the assessee, being a Cooperative Society and not a cooperative bank, was eligible for the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) for interest income earned from deposits with Kangra Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. The appeal was allowed, and the disallowance was directed to be reversed.
Order Pronounced: The appeal of the Assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open Court on 16/02/2024.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.