AO cannot reopen assessment based on mere change of opinion regarding short term capital gains classification

The Bombay HC ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reopening of assessment was invalid as it constituted a mere change of opinion. The court found that the issue of short term capital gain on the flat sale was already considered during original assessment proceedings where the AO had examined the matter and made no addition. The AO's subsequent contradictory view that the asset was a short term capital asset did not justify reopening under the assumption that income had escaped assessment. The change of opinion alone cannot constitute valid grounds for reassessment proceedings.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Validity of the reassessment proceedings.
2. Concept of change of opinion in reassessment.
3. Legal standing of the reassessment under new provisions of the Finance Act 2021.

Summary:

1. Validity of the reassessment proceedings:

The petitioner filed a return of income for AY-2018-19, which was selected for limited scrutiny concerning investments in immovable property and capital gains. After providing the required details, an assessment order was passed on 28th April 2021, accepting the income computed without any additions. Subsequently, almost a year later, the petitioner received a notice under Section 148A(a) of the Income Tax Act, seeking details of the same property sale. Despite the petitioner's objections, an order dated 31st March 2022, under Section 148A(d), and a notice under Section 148 were issued, treating the asset as a short-term capital asset.

2. Concept of change of opinion in reassessment:

The petitioner argued that the reassessment was based on a change of opinion, which is not permissible. The court referred to the case of Siemens Financial Services Private Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors., which held that reassessment cannot be initiated on the basis of a change of opinion. The court emphasized that the Assessing Officer (AO) does not have the power to review but only to reassess. The concept of change of opinion serves as a check against the abuse of power by the AO. The court cited several precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in Kelvinator of India Ltd., which stated that reassessment must be based on tangible material and not merely on a change of opinion.

3. Legal standing of the reassessment under new provisions of the Finance Act 2021:

The respondents argued that the reassessment scheme had changed with the new provisions introduced by the Finance Act 2021, rendering the concept of change of opinion inapplicable. However, the court noted that its judgment in Siemens Financial Services Private Limited still upheld the applicability of the change of opinion concept. The court concluded that the reassessment in this case was indeed based on a change of opinion, as the issue of short-term capital gain on the said flat had already been considered and resolved in the original assessment proceedings.

Conclusion:

The court found that the reopening of the assessment was purely on the basis of a change of opinion, which does not justify the assumption that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment. Therefore, the impugned order and notice dated 31st March 2022 were quashed. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute, disposing of the petition in favor of the petitioner.

---