Assessee wins appeal as Section 43CA doesn't apply to pre-2014 sale agreements with timely consideration payment

The ITAT Jaipur allowed the assessee's appeal against addition under section 43CA regarding difference between sale consideration shown by assessee (Rs. 1,51,00,000) and value adopted by Sub-Registrar for stamp duty. The tribunal held that since the sale agreement was executed on 10/09/2008, prior to section 43CA's enactment from 01/04/2014, and 90% consideration was received within five days of agreement through account payee cheque, section 43CA(3) exception applied. The provision protects cases where consideration flows before the agreement date, making the revenue's addition unsustainable.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Addition under Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Application of Section 43CA(1) ignoring provisos to Section 43CA(3) and 43CA(4).
3. Dismissal of appeal without considering detailed submissions.
4. Validity of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Summary:

Issue 1: Addition under Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act, 1961

The assessee, a private limited company engaged in real estate, sold property for Rs. 1,51,00,000, but the sub-registrar valued it at Rs. 2,77,87,868 for stamp duty purposes. The Assessing Officer (AO) added the difference of Rs. 1,26,87,868 to the assessee's income under Section 43CA. The CIT(A) upheld this addition, noting the assessee received part payment by cheque after the agreement date, making Section 43CA(1) applicable. The assessee argued that 90% of the consideration was received within five days of the agreement in 2008, much before Section 43CA became effective in 2014.

Issue 2: Application of Section 43CA(1) ignoring provisos to Section 43CA(3) and 43CA(4)

The assessee contended that the provisions of Section 43CA should not apply as the agreement was executed in 2008, and 90% of the consideration was received within five days. The Tribunal noted that Section 43CA(3) and (4) allow for the consideration on the date of agreement to be used if part of the consideration is received by any mode other than cash on or before the agreement date. The Tribunal found that the assessee received Rs. 1,34,90,000 through cheque on 15/09/2008, fulfilling the provisos, and thus the addition under Section 43CA was vacated.

Issue 3: Dismissal of appeal without considering detailed submissions

The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) failed to consider the detailed submissions and case laws cited by the assessee, violating principles of natural justice. The CIT(A) merely quoted the AO's order without addressing the assessee's arguments, leading to a non-speaking order.

Issue 4: Validity of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Since the Tribunal deleted the addition under Section 43CA, the consequent penalty of Rs. 41,16,578 under Section 271(1)(c) did not survive. The appeal against the penalty was deemed infructuous.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, vacating the addition under Section 43CA and the consequent penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering detailed submissions and following statutory procedures.

---