Interest income on margin money for guarantees eligible for adjustment against capital work-in-progress when linked to plant setup

ITAT Mumbai dismissed revenue's appeal and partially allowed assessee's appeal. The tribunal held that interest income on margin money kept with banks for guarantees and letters of credit was eligible for adjustment against capital work-in-progress, being inextricably linked to plant setup. Assessment under section 153A was deemed invalid absent incriminating material found during search. Overvaluation addition on imported capital goods was deleted as the underlying DRI show-cause notice was cancelled. Disallowance of excess expenses under section 37(1) was reversed, ruling that actual payments made wholly for business purposes cannot be disallowed merely for exceeding contracted prices. Compensation received for project delays was correctly characterized as capital in nature, adjustable against capital work-in-progress.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Taxation of interest earned on 'margin money' with banks.
2. Disallowance of over-valued part of cost of imported capital goods.
3. Disallowance of interest on capital borrowed for overvalued part of imported capital goods.
4. Treatment of compensation received from M/s Essar Oil Ltd.
5. Disallowance of depreciation claimed on overvalued part of work-in-progress post capitalization.
6. Validity of additions without incriminating material found during the search.

Summary:

1. Taxation of Interest Earned on 'Margin Money':
The Assessing Officer (AO) treated the interest income of Rs. 1,00,77,381/- earned on margin money kept with banks as taxable under 'income from other sources'. The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the assessee's appeal by citing the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Bokaro Steel Ltd., stating that interest earned on deposits linked to the setting up of the plant should reduce the cost of assets. The Tribunal upheld this view, noting the interest was inextricably linked to the project setup and thus deductible against capital work-in-progress. Additionally, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's legal ground that no addition could be made in non-abated assessments without incriminating material found during the search.

2. Disallowance of Over-Valued Part of Cost of Imported Capital Goods:
The AO disallowed Rs. 1,29,32,54,291/- for overvaluation of imported capital goods based on a Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) show cause notice. The Ld. CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, noting the assessee had a fixed price contract with EPIL, insulating it from price fluctuations. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing the assessee's contractual obligations and the cancellation of the DRI's show cause notice.

3. Disallowance of Interest on Capital Borrowed for Overvalued Part of Imported Capital Goods:
The AO disallowed interest of Rs. 87,89,98,214/- calculated at 12% on funds borrowed for the overvalued imported capital goods. The Ld. CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, and the Tribunal upheld this, given the deletion of the corresponding overvaluation addition.

4. Treatment of Compensation Received from M/s Essar Oil Ltd.:
The AO treated the Rs. 240 crores compensation from Essar Oil Ltd. as business income. The Ld. CIT(A) held it as a capital receipt, reducing the capital work-in-progress. The Tribunal upheld this, noting the compensation was for delayed commissioning due to non-supply of gas, thus linked to capital costs.

5. Disallowance of Depreciation Claimed on Overvalued Part of Work-in-Progress Post Capitalization:
The Tribunal noted that this issue was consequential to the overvaluation addition, which was deleted. Thus, the disallowance of depreciation was also dismissed.

6. Validity of Additions Without Incriminating Material Found During the Search:
The Tribunal reiterated that no additions in non-abated assessments could be made without incriminating material found during the search, aligning with the Supreme Court's decision in PCIT vs Abhisar Buildwell P. Ltd.

Conclusion:
The appeals of the Revenue for assessment years 2013-14 to 2019-2020 were dismissed, while the appeals and cross-objections of the assessee were allowed.

---