Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to provisional release of the imported areca nuts under the trade agreement framework despite the customs authorities' objection based on alleged doubts regarding the certificate of origin and a request for additional information.
Analysis: The goods were covered by a certificate of origin issued by the competent Sri Lankan authority and that certificate was subsequently verified by the Department of Commerce, Government of Sri Lanka as having been digitally signed by the authorised officer. The communication relied on by the customs authorities from the exporter did not name the petitioner, and the request for further information was not placed on record. While Rule 6(2) permits the proper officer to seek additional information after verification, the material on record did not justify continued detention of the goods. At the same time, revenue interests required limited protective conditions.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to provisional release of the goods, subject to furnishing an indemnity bond for 100% of the duty payable, and a bank guarantee for 10% of the customs duty, until assessment was concluded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a certificate of origin issued by the competent foreign authority is verified as genuine and the customs objection is unsupported by a recorded request for further information, provisional release may be ordered subject to suitable revenue safeguards.