Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners, facing prosecution in cases arising out of alleged tax evasion and connected offences, were entitled to regular bail after completion of investigation and filing of challan.
Analysis: The petitions were considered on settled bail principles, including the nature and gravity of accusation, the triple test of flight risk, tampering with evidence, and influence over witnesses, and the principle that bail is ordinarily the rule while refusal is the exception. The investigation had concluded and challan had been presented. In these circumstances, further custodial detention was not shown to be necessary, and the Court found no reason to deny bail merely because the allegations involved economic offences. The order also proceeded on the settled approach that liberty must be balanced against the needs of fair investigation and trial.
Conclusion: The petitioners were held entitled to regular bail and were ordered to be released on bail on furnishing the requisite bonds and sureties, subject to the stated conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: Once investigation is complete and the custodial purpose is exhausted, regular bail may be granted in economic offence cases if the triple test is satisfied and continued detention is not necessary to secure trial or prevent misuse of liberty.