Assessee wins appeal as revision order under Section 263 set aside for lack of proper inquiry demonstration

ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee's appeal against CIT's revision order u/s 263. The CIT had found the assessment erroneous claiming AO failed to properly inquire about loss on sale of preferential shares, noting discrepancies between balance sheet and income computation values. ITAT held no variance existed as CIT made improper comparisons between cost of acquisition and sale consideration. The assessee had properly accounted for all differences in the return. CIT also questioned lack of evidence regarding related party sales and ROC intimation, but failed to demonstrate how this would cause revenue prejudice. Regarding dividend from foreign company, ITAT found no error as assessee had properly returned it to tax, with facts clearly available in assessment records. The revision order was set aside.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Assessment of Long Term Capital Loss on redemption of preference shares.
3. Taxability of dividend income from a foreign company.
4. Reliance on audit objections for revision of assessment.
5. Impact of the Faceless Assessment Scheme on the assessment order.

Summary:

1. Validity of the order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The assessee challenged the order passed by the ld.Pr.CIT under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arguing that it was based on a hypothesis without cogent materials. The Tribunal noted that the primary grievance was against the ld.Pr.CIT exercising revisionary power and setting aside the assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act.

2. Assessment of Long Term Capital Loss on redemption of preference shares:
The ld.Pr.CIT assumed jurisdiction for revision, noting anomalies in the value of shares sold as reflected in the balance sheet/profit & loss account versus the computation of income. The assessee explained that the difference was due to realized forex loss on the sale of preference shares, which was recognized in the profit and loss account and disallowed while computing business income. The Tribunal found that the ld.Pr.CIT's comparison of cost of acquisition with sale consideration was improper and did not indicate any error in the assessment order. The Tribunal held that there was no error in the assessment order on account of non-inquiry/inadequate inquiry relating to the issue of preferential shares sold during the year.

3. Taxability of dividend income from a foreign company:
The ld.Pr.CIT noted that the assessee claimed exempt income for dividend received from a foreign company, which should have been taxable. The assessee clarified that the dividend income was offered to tax under section 115BBD of the Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had indeed returned the dividend income to tax, and there was no error in the assessment order regarding this issue. The Tribunal stated that the ld.Pr.CIT's claim of inadequate inquiry was unfounded as the facts were clear from the computation of income.

4. Reliance on audit objections for revision of assessment:
The assessee argued that audit objections could not be the basis for revision of an assessment. The Tribunal did not find any substantive discussion on this issue in the ld.Pr.CIT's order and thus did not address it separately.

5. Impact of the Faceless Assessment Scheme on the assessment order:
The assessee contended that the Faceless Assessment Scheme had sufficient checks and balances, making it impossible for the Assessing Officer to structure an order prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal did not find this argument addressed in the ld.Pr.CIT's order and thus did not delve into it.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal held that the order passed by the ld.Pr.CIT was not sustainable in law due to the absence of any finding of error on both the aspects of preferential shares sold during the year and dividend income earned from the foreign company not returned to tax. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.

---