Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Taxpayer Wins Challenge Against GST Calculation Error, Granted Opportunity to Rectify E-Way Bill HSN Code Mistake</h1> <h3>Unique Speciality Chemicals Versus Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (E-103)</h3> HC ruled in favor of the petitioner regarding an erroneous GST calculation on an E-way bill. The court quashed the impugned order and directed the ... Tax demand which is 1817 times what was really due and payable - error in the E-way bill or not - inadvertent mistake or not - HELD THAT:- It appears that there is a clear error in the punching and because of which the system calculated a tax amount which was certainly not commensurate with the actual E-way bill when the tax amount was only Rs. 3081/-. Considering these issues, an appropriate decision could have been taken by the Designated Officer in consultation with the higher authorities - following the principles as discussed in the decision of this Court in Star Engineers (I) Pvt. Ltd. [2023 (12) TMI 729 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT], it is opined that the Petitioner needs to be permitted to correct the bonafide mistakes, more particularly considering that there is no loss of revenue to the Department. It is deemed appropriate to dispose of this Petition - petition disposed off. Issues Involved:The issues involved in the judgment are related to erroneous calculation of GST on an E-way bill due to a mistake in punching the HSN code, issuance of show cause notice, submission of relevant documents by the Petitioner, passing of order by Designated Officer without considering the explanation provided, and the need for rectification of the mistake to avoid undue financial burden on the Petitioner.Summary of Judgment:Issue 1: Erroneous Calculation of GST on E-way BillThe Petitioner mistakenly punched the wrong HSN code in the E-way bill, resulting in a significant miscalculation of GST. The actual taxable value was Rs. 3,081.60, but the system calculated GST of Rs. 61,28,836.20, leading to a tax demand 1817 times higher than what was due. The Petitioner had voluntarily reversed the tax credit before the show cause notice was issued, indicating no loss of revenue to the Department.Issue 2: Show Cause Notice and ResponseFollowing the erroneous calculation, a show cause notice was issued to the Petitioner, who promptly replied, explaining the inadvertent mistake and providing all relevant documents to support their claim. Despite the submission of detailed explanations and documents, the Designated Officer passed an order without considering the Petitioner's contentions, leading to the Petitioner approaching the Court.Issue 3: Judicial Review of Designated Officer's OrderThe Petitioner contended that the impugned order was mechanical and lacked application of mind, failing to address the bonafide error made in the E-way bill. The Court noted the clear error in the calculation and emphasized the need for rectification without causing any loss to the Department's revenue.Judicial Decision and OrderAfter hearing both parties, the Court quashed the Impugned Order dated 29th July 2022 and directed the Petitioner to approach the Department for correcting the error in the tariff code within three weeks. The Department was instructed to accept and process the corrections, followed by a review of the Petitioner's Returns in accordance with the law. The judgment highlighted the importance of rectifying bonafide mistakes to prevent undue financial burden on taxpayers and emphasized the principles laid down in previous court decisions regarding such matters.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found