Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's products, namely Bio pro-enhac and Minwa and Minwa plus, were correctly classified under HSN 2309 so as to qualify for GST exemption, and whether the assessment order required interference.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the products were shrimp feed or supplements/additives covered by the exemption notification, or whether they were independently classifiable as vitamins, pro-vitamins, or organo-inorganic compounds taxable at 18%. On the materials placed, Minwa and Minwa plus were found to be used primarily for controlling pH and alkalinity in shrimp pond water and not as feed, supplement, or additive; therefore that product was held to fall outside HSN 2309 and outside the exemption. For Bio pro-enhac, the record showed that it was treated in the assessment as a powder mixed with pelleted feed and used to improve immunity, digestion, and intake, but the authority had not dealt with the cited precedents and the exemption claim in a reasoned manner before concluding on classification.
Conclusion: The classification of Minwa and Minwa plus under the taxable entry was sustained, but the finding on Bio pro-enhac was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.