Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the consideration received under the slaughter tapping arrangement was taxable under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 as sale turnover, or whether the arrangement was merely a licence or profit a prendre carrying no sales tax liability.
Analysis: The agreement authorised the third party to tap the rubber trees and appropriate the latex, and the consideration was paid for the latex obtained, not merely for a bare right to collect it. The absence of any contractual provision dealing with the latex after expiry of the licence period supported the view that the transaction involved transfer of property in the latex to the third party. The statutory definitions of agriculturist and turnover under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 were also relied on to hold that a company holding rubber plantations did not get the benefit available to an agriculturist.
Conclusion: The arrangement was held to be a taxable sale of latex and not a mere grant of licence or profit a prendre, and the demand under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was upheld against the assessee.