Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to bail in a case alleging forged bills and wrongful availment of input tax credit, and if so, on what conditions.
Analysis: The applicant was in custody in connection with allegations of forgery and wrongful gain through input tax credit. The Court noted that the offence under the GST law was punishable up to three years, that the applicant was implicated on the basis of a memorandum of the main , and that he expressed readiness to deposit 5% of the amount linked to the alleged transactions. In these circumstances, the Court found it to grant bail subject to safeguards protecting the revenue interest.
Conclusion: Bail was granted to the applicant subject to deposit of 5% of the amount with the GST authorities, compliance with the specified conditions, furnishing of personal bond and solvent sureties, and observance of the conditions under Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.