TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned show cause notices ought to be stayed pending adjudication of the writ petition in view of the challenge based on delayed adjudication and want of jurisdiction.
Analysis: The petition was entertained under Article 226 and the Court found no reason to take a different view from earlier orders granting protection in similar matters. The Court treated the age of the notices and the pending legal challenge as sufficient grounds to continue interim protection, while leaving the respondents free to seek vacating of the stay in appropriate circumstances.
Conclusion: The impugned show cause notices were ordered to remain stayed, granting interim relief to the petitioner.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was admitted and interim protection was continued against further adjudication of the impugned notices.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
