Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount corresponding to trade tax exemption on sales under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, claimed by the assessee as a capital receipt or subsidy, was in law a capital receipt or a revenue receipt.
Analysis: The exemption under Section 4-A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was a statutory exemption from liability to pay trade tax and not a subsidy granted by the State Government. The Act contained no provision authorising the assessee to collect tax on exempted sales and retain it as a capital subsidy. Sections 8-A(2)(b) and 29-A reinforced that any amount realised as trade tax had to be dealt with only in accordance with the statute, and no part of the sale price could be treated as a capital receipt merely because it corresponded to an exempted tax component. The receipts were shown as part of the sale price received from purchasers, and a self-devised bifurcation of sale proceeds into a supposed tax component was impermissible.
Conclusion: The amount claimed on account of trade tax exemption formed part of the sale price and was a revenue receipt, not a capital receipt or subsidy.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory exemption from sales tax does not, by itself, convert the embedded tax component in sale proceeds into a capital subsidy or capital receipt unless the statute expressly authorises such subsidy or retention.